DEUS vs SCHD
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, DEUS or SCHD?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. DEUS led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. DEUS is less concentrated, with 6.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DEUS | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.17% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $300M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.38% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 868 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +13.56% | +25.07%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.38% | +27.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.99%Best | +15.74% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.39% | +9.89%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.9% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,663 | $16,025Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 6.5%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2015 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 24, 2015 to Sep 11, 2026 (10.8 years).
DEUS vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.8 years both funds cover.
DEUS vs SCHD Performance
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year DEUS returned +14.38% while SCHD returned +27.61%. Year to date, DEUS is up 13.56% versus a gain of 25.07% for SCHD.
Over three years, DEUS compounded at +15.99% per year against +15.74% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.39% and +9.89% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.23% annualized vs +10.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DEUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 14.8% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.9% for DEUS and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DEUS charges 0.17% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $6 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DEUS currently yields 1.38% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
10.5% of DEUS's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 98.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings DEUS also owns.
Most of SCHD is already inside DEUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
63 positions in common, counted across the 864 positions we hold weights for in DEUS and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 868 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 36 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for DEUS (1.9% of the fund), and 771 for DEUS that do not appear in SCHD (86.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DEUS | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.15% | 4.77% | 4.62% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.13% | 4.70% | 4.57% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.09% | 4.69% | 4.60% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 0.41% | 3.94% | 3.53% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 0.30% | 3.97% | 3.67% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.05% | 4.17% | 4.12% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 0.04% | 4.02% | 3.98% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 0.14% | 3.82% | 3.68% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.04% | 3.88% | 3.84% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.07% | 3.83% | 3.76% |
98.0% of SCHD is already inside DEUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DEUS or SCHD?
DEUS has an expense ratio of 0.17% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DEUS or SCHD?
Over the past year DEUS returned +14.38% vs +27.61% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), DEUS annualized +10.32% vs +11.23% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DEUS or SCHD?
DEUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 14.8% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: DEUS -40.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both DEUS and SCHD?
DEUS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DEUS and SCHD?
98.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings DEUS also owns. 98.0% of SCHD's is in holdings DEUS also owns. They hold 63 positions in common, counted across the 864 positions we hold weights for in DEUS and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, DEUS or SCHD?
DEUS yields 1.38% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than DEUS?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. DEUS led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. DEUS is less concentrated, with 6.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.