DEUS vs QQQ
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DEUS or QQQ?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
DEUS has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DEUS is less concentrated, with 6.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DEUS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.17%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $303M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.38% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 868 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +15.80% | +17.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +18.82% | +26.50%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.53% | +24.58%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.39% | +14.15%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7%Best | 18.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -40.9% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,663 | $19,381Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 6.5%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 24, 2015 to Sep 3, 2026 (10.8 years).
DEUS vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.8 years both funds cover.
DEUS vs QQQ Performance
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DEUS returned +18.82% while QQQ returned +26.50%. Year to date, DEUS is up 15.80% versus a gain of 17.33% for QQQ.
Over three years, DEUS compounded at +16.53% per year against +24.58% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.39% and +14.15% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.97% annualized vs +10.54%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.7% for DEUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.9% for DEUS and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DEUS charges 0.17% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DEUS currently yields 1.38% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
8.4% of DEUS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 81.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings DEUS also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside DEUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
78 positions in common, counted across the 864 positions we hold weights for in DEUS and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 868 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 18 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DEUS (15.7% of the fund), and 758 for DEUS that do not appear in QQQ (88.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DEUS | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 0.03% | 8.44% | 8.41% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.28% | 7.27% | 6.99% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 0.09% | 5.76% | 5.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.04% | 4.67% | 4.63% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.01% | 4.43% | 4.42% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 0.12% | 3.36% | 3.24% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.10% | 3.13% | 3.03% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.02% | 3.16% | 3.14% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 0.02% | 2.78% | 2.76% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 0.03% | 2.41% | 2.38% |
81.8% of QQQ is already inside DEUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DEUS or QQQ?
DEUS has an expense ratio of 0.17% while QQQ charges 0.18%. DEUS is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DEUS or QQQ?
Over the past year DEUS returned +18.82% vs +26.50% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), DEUS annualized +10.54% vs +18.97% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DEUS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.7% for DEUS. Worst drawdown: DEUS -40.9% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both DEUS and QQQ?
DEUS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DEUS and QQQ?
81.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings DEUS also owns. 81.8% of QQQ's is in holdings DEUS also owns. They hold 78 positions in common, counted across the 864 positions we hold weights for in DEUS and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DEUS or QQQ?
DEUS yields 1.38% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DEUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DEUS?
DEUS has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DEUS is less concentrated, with 6.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.