DEUS vs IVV
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DEUS or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. DEUS is less concentrated, with 6.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DEUS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.17% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $303M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.38% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 868 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +15.80%Best | +13.86% |
| 1Y Return | +18.82% | +21.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.53% | +21.48%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.39% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.9% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,663 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 6.5%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2015 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 24, 2015 to Sep 3, 2026 (10.8 years).
DEUS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.8 years both funds cover.
DEUS vs IVV Performance
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DEUS returned +18.82% while IVV returned +21.57%. Year to date, DEUS is up 15.80% versus a gain of 13.86% for IVV.
Over three years, DEUS compounded at +16.53% per year against +21.48% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.39% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.69% annualized vs +10.54%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DEUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.9% for DEUS and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DEUS charges 0.17% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $17 vs $3 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DEUS currently yields 1.38% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
67.3% of DEUS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 91.5% of IVV's money is in holdings DEUS also owns.
Most of IVV is already inside DEUS. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
465 positions in common, counted across the 864 positions we hold weights for in DEUS and 505 in IVV, against full books of 868 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 34 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DEUS (7.8% of the fund), and 373 for DEUS that do not appear in IVV (30.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DEUS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 0.03% | 7.98% | 7.95% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.28% | 6.86% | 6.58% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 0.09% | 5.44% | 5.35% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.04% | 4.01% | 3.97% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 0.12% | 3.19% | 3.07% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.02% | 2.98% | 2.96% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 0.10% | 2.56% | 2.46% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 0.02% | 1.94% | 1.92% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.01% | 1.51% | 1.50% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 0.04% | 1.43% | 1.39% |
91.5% of IVV is already inside DEUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DEUS or IVV?
DEUS has an expense ratio of 0.17% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DEUS or IVV?
Over the past year DEUS returned +18.82% vs +21.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), DEUS annualized +10.54% vs +13.69% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DEUS or IVV?
DEUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DEUS -40.9% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both DEUS and IVV?
DEUS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DEUS and IVV?
91.5% of IVV's money is in holdings DEUS also owns. 91.5% of IVV's is in holdings DEUS also owns. They hold 465 positions in common, counted across the 864 positions we hold weights for in DEUS and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DEUS or IVV?
DEUS yields 1.38% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DEUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DEUS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. DEUS is less concentrated, with 6.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.