DFMC vs IVV
Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DFMC or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DFMC led over 1Y. DFMC is less concentrated, with 5.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DFMC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7.7B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.22% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,762 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +16.84%Best | +12.78% |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.53% |
| Top 10 Weight | 5.5%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DFMC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DFMC vs IVV Performance
Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) is an ETF from Dimensional and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, DFMC is up 16.84% versus a gain of 12.78% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DFMC charges 0.41% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $3 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DFMC currently yields 0.22% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1,733 holdings in DFMC and 490 in IVV, totalling 102.1% and 99.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1,733 positions we hold weights for in DFMC and 490 in IVV, against full books of 1,762 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DFMC (98.6% of the fund), and 1,353 for DFMC that do not appear in IVV (97.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of DFMC and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DFMC or IVV?
DFMC has an expense ratio of 0.41% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, DFMC or IVV?
DFMC yields 0.22% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DFMC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DFMC led over 1Y. DFMC is less concentrated, with 5.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.