DRIV vs VTI
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DRIV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRIV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $380M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 79 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.16% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.62% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.61% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.60% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 13, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
DRIV vs VTI Performance
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DRIV returned +40.62% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, DRIV is up 18.16% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, DRIV compounded at +14.61% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.60% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, DRIV has the edge at +11.69% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DRIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.9% for DRIV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRIV charges 0.68% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRIV currently yields 0.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DRIV and VTI share 29 holdings out of 2829 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRIV or VTI?
DRIV has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DRIV or VTI?
Over the past year DRIV returned +40.62% vs +22.19% for VTI, so DRIV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DRIV annualized +11.69% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DRIV or VTI?
DRIV has been the more volatile fund at 27.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DRIV -41.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DRIV and VTI?
DRIV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DRIV and VTI?
DRIV and VTI share 29 common holdings with a 11.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2829 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRIV or VTI?
DRIV yields 0.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.