DRIV vs VOO
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. DRIV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DRIV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $380M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 79 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +16.91% | +13.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +41.94% | +22.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.22% | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.38% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 13, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
DRIV vs VOO Performance
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DRIV returned +41.94% while VOO returned +22.62%. Year to date, DRIV is up 16.91% versus a gain of 13.44% for VOO.
Over three years, DRIV compounded at +14.22% per year against +21.47% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.38% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +11.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DRIV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.9% for DRIV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DRIV charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DRIV currently yields 0.57% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
DRIV and VOO share 15 holdings out of 565 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DRIV or VOO?
DRIV has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DRIV or VOO?
Over the past year DRIV returned +41.94% vs +22.62% for VOO, so DRIV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DRIV annualized +11.56% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DRIV or VOO?
DRIV has been the more volatile fund at 27.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: DRIV -41.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both DRIV and VOO?
DRIV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DRIV and VOO?
DRIV and VOO share 15 common holdings with a 11.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 565 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DRIV or VOO?
DRIV yields 0.57% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.