DURA vs IVV
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DURA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $39M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.10% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 71 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +18.65% | +12.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.22% | +20.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.54% | +12.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
DURA vs IVV Performance
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF (DURA) is a ETF from VanEck and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DURA returned +18.22% while IVV returned +20.24%. Year to date, DURA is up 18.65% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, DURA compounded at +11.45% per year against +21.78% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.54% and +12.84% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, DURA has the edge at +9.24% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for DURA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DURA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DURA charges 0.30% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DURA currently yields 3.10% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DURA and IVV share 63 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DURA or IVV?
DURA has an expense ratio of 0.30% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DURA or IVV?
Over the past year DURA returned +18.22% vs +20.24% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DURA annualized +9.24% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DURA or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for DURA. Worst drawdown: DURA -35.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DURA and IVV?
DURA and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DURA and IVV?
DURA and IVV share 63 common holdings with a 10.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DURA or IVV?
DURA yields 3.10% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DURA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.