DURA vs QQQ
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DURA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $39M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.10% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 71 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +18.42% | +16.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.00% | +25.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.29% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.50% | +14.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DURA vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF (DURA) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DURA returned +18.00% while QQQ returned +25.22%. Year to date, DURA is up 18.42% versus a gain of 16.19% for QQQ.
Over three years, DURA compounded at +11.29% per year against +25.47% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +7.50% and +14.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.01% annualized vs +9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 14.5% for DURA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DURA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DURA charges 0.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $18 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DURA currently yields 3.10% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DURA and QQQ share 11 holdings out of 160 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DURA or QQQ?
DURA has an expense ratio of 0.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DURA or QQQ?
Over the past year DURA returned +18.00% vs +25.22% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DURA annualized +9.21% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DURA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 14.5% for DURA. Worst drawdown: DURA -35.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DURA and QQQ?
DURA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DURA and QQQ?
DURA and QQQ share 11 common holdings with a 6.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 160 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DURA or QQQ?
DURA yields 3.10% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DURA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.