DURA vs SCHD
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, DURA or SCHD?
Nearly the same fund. SCHD costs less.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DURA | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $45M | $108.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.01% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 140 | 206 |
| YTD Return | +12.82% | +22.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.31% | +26.66%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.90% | +16.06%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.36% | +9.39%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4%Best | 16.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,263 | $15,663Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.9% | 41.8%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2018 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 31, 2018 to Oct 9, 2026 (7.9 years).
DURA vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.9 years both funds cover.
DURA vs SCHD Performance
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF (DURA) is an ETF from VanEck and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year DURA returned +14.31% while SCHD returned +26.66%. Year to date, DURA is up 12.82% versus a gain of 22.08% for SCHD.
Over three years, DURA compounded at +10.90% per year against +16.06% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +7.36% and +9.39% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.83% annualized vs +8.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.4% for DURA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DURA and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DURA charges 0.30% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $6 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DURA currently yields 3.01% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
46.4% of DURA's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 48.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings DURA also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in DURA and 99 in SCHD, against full books of 140 and 206.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 82 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for DURA (51.9% of the fund), and 52 for DURA that do not appear in SCHD (53.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DURA | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 5.72% | 4.77% | 0.95% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 5.33% | 4.29% | 1.04% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 5.17% | 4.26% | 0.91% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc Vz | 4.72% | 4.12% | 0.60% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 3.71% | 3.63% | 0.08% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 3.95% | 3.31% | 0.64% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 2.97% | 4.24% | 1.27% |
| MOAltria Group Inc. | 4.11% | 2.88% | 1.23% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 2.68% | 4.19% | 1.51% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 2.16% | 4.44% | 2.28% |
48.0% of SCHD is already inside DURA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DURA or SCHD?
DURA has an expense ratio of 0.30% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DURA or SCHD?
Over the past year DURA returned +14.31% vs +26.66% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DURA annualized +8.40% vs +11.83% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DURA or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.4% for DURA. Worst drawdown: DURA -35.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both DURA and SCHD?
DURA and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DURA and SCHD?
48.0% of SCHD's money is in holdings DURA also owns. 48.0% of SCHD's is in holdings DURA also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 69 positions we hold weights for in DURA and 99 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, DURA or SCHD?
DURA yields 3.01% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so DURA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than DURA?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.