DURA vs VTI
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DURA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $39M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.10% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 71 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.23% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.88% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.51% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.36% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 30, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
DURA vs VTI Performance
VanEck Durable High Dividend ETF (DURA) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DURA returned +18.88% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, DURA is up 18.23% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, DURA compounded at +11.51% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.36% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, DURA has the edge at +9.21% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.5% for DURA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.3% for DURA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DURA charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DURA currently yields 3.10% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DURA and VTI share 64 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DURA or VTI?
DURA has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DURA or VTI?
Over the past year DURA returned +18.88% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), DURA annualized +9.21% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DURA or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.5% for DURA. Worst drawdown: DURA -35.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DURA and VTI?
DURA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DURA and VTI?
DURA and VTI share 64 common holdings with a 8.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DURA or VTI?
DURA yields 3.10% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DURA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.