EDOW vs VYM

EDOW vs VYM

Which is better, EDOW or VYM?

Nearly the same fund. VYM costs less.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. EDOW led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEDOWVYM
Expense Ratio0.50%0.04%Best
AUM$328M$81.6B
Dividend Yield1.24%2.24%
Holdings62613
YTD Return+12.38%+14.82%Best
1Y Return+18.28%+20.84%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+17.07%+18.64%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+10.18%+12.28%Best
Volatility (annualized)15.4%14.8%Best
Max Drawdown-33.7%Best-35.7%
$10,000 over 5 years$16,237$17,845Best
Top 10 Weight36.4%25.9%Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionAug 8, 2017Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 9, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (9.1 years).

EDOW vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.1 years both funds cover.

EDOW vs VYM Performance

First Trust Dow 30 Equal Weight ETF (EDOW) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDOW returned +18.28% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, EDOW is up 12.38% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.

Over three years, EDOW compounded at +17.07% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.18% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, EDOW has the edge at +10.89% annualized vs +10.27%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EDOW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 14.8% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.7% for EDOW and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EDOW charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDOW currently yields 1.24% against 2.24% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

EDOW already in VYM58.9%
VYM already in EDOW23.1%

58.9% of EDOW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 23.1% of VYM's money is in holdings EDOW also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

18 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in EDOW and 603 in VYM, against full books of 62 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 552 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for EDOW (74.3% of the fund), and 12 for EDOW that do not appear in VYM (40.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EDOWWeight in VYMDifference
JPMJpmorgan Chase3.57%3.38%0.19%
JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common3.32%2.54%0.78%
CATCaterpillar, Inc.3.13%2.01%1.12%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares3.14%1.93%1.21%
HDHome Depot Inc/The3.40%1.46%1.94%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated3.11%1.56%1.55%
MRKMerck & Company Inc3.31%1.32%1.99%
KOCoca Cola Co.3.19%1.31%1.88%
AMGNAmgen Inc.3.71%0.75%2.96%
PGProcter & Gamble Company3.03%1.42%1.61%

58.9% of EDOW is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

EDOWVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EDOW or VYM?

EDOW has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EDOW or VYM?

Over the past year EDOW returned +18.28% vs +20.84% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), EDOW annualized +10.89% vs +10.27% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EDOW or VYM?

EDOW has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 14.8% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EDOW -33.7% vs VYM -35.7%.

Should I hold both EDOW and VYM?

EDOW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between EDOW and VYM?

58.9% of EDOW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 23.1% of VYM's is in holdings EDOW also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in EDOW and 603 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, EDOW or VYM?

EDOW yields 1.24% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than EDOW?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. EDOW led over the full window, VYM over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.