EGGS vs IVV
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EGGS or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EGGS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $58M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 21.92% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 44 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +11.59% | +12.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.06% | +18.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.2% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,443 | $13,055Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 62.4% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | NestYield | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 27, 2024 to Sep 9, 2026 (1.7 years).
EGGS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
EGGS vs IVV Performance
NestYield Total Return Guard ETF (EGGS) is an ETF from NestYield and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EGGS returned +7.06% while IVV returned +18.61%. Year to date, EGGS is up 11.59% versus a gain of 12.24% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EGGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 12.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.2% for EGGS and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EGGS charges 0.93% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $3 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EGGS currently yields 21.92% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
75.7% of EGGS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 11.8% of IVV's money is in holdings EGGS also owns.
Most of EGGS is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
16 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in EGGS and 505 in IVV, against full books of 44 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 480 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EGGS (87.5% of the fund), and 4 for EGGS that do not appear in IVV (19.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EGGS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc | 8.47% | 0.28% | 8.19% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.57% | 4.01% | 0.44% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 7.08% | 0.10% | 6.98% |
| COHRCoherent, Inc | 7.04% | 0.10% | 6.94% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 6.72% | 0.27% | 6.45% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.02% | 3.19% | 0.17% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 4.49% | 0.72% | 3.77% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 4.62% | 0.33% | 4.29% |
| CAHCardinal Health Inc. | 4.46% | 0.08% | 4.38% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 3.83% | 0.63% | 3.20% |
75.7% of EGGS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EGGS or IVV?
EGGS has an expense ratio of 0.93% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $90 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EGGS or IVV?
Over the past year EGGS returned +7.06% vs +18.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), EGGS annualized +13.72% vs +16.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EGGS or IVV?
EGGS has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 12.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EGGS -24.2% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both EGGS and IVV?
EGGS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EGGS and IVV?
75.7% of EGGS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 11.8% of IVV's is in holdings EGGS also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in EGGS and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EGGS or IVV?
EGGS yields 21.92% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EGGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EGGS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.