EMCS vs RWEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Which is better, EMCS or RWEM?
EMCS has been ahead.
EMCS has a lower expense ratio. EMCS led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCS | RWEM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.52% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $61M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.53% | 1.93% |
| Holdings | 148 | 479 |
| YTD Return | +17.10%Best | +8.93% |
| 1Y Return | +21.59%Best | +14.75% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.92% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.37% | - |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
EMCS vs RWEM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EMCS vs RWEM Performance
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Select ETF (EMCS) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (RWEM) is an ETF from The Advisors Inner Circle Fund. Over the past year EMCS returned +21.59% while RWEM returned +14.75%. Year to date, EMCS is up 17.10% versus a gain of 8.93% for RWEM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCS charges 0.15% per year while RWEM charges 0.52%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $52 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCS currently yields 1.53% against 1.93% for RWEM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMCS and RWEM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCS or RWEM?
EMCS has an expense ratio of 0.15% while RWEM charges 0.52%. EMCS is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMCS or RWEM?
Over the past year EMCS returned +21.59% vs +14.75% for RWEM, so EMCS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCS or RWEM?
EMCS yields 1.53% while RWEM yields 1.93%, so RWEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWEM better than EMCS?
EMCS has a lower expense ratio. EMCS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.