EOD vs VXUS
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOD | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.37% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $315M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.57% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 397 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +19.90% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.17% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.21% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.84% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -85.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2007 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EOD vs VXUS Performance
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EOD returned +28.17% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, EOD is up 19.90% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, EOD compounded at +27.21% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.84% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs -2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.6% for EOD and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOD charges 1.37% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $137 vs $5 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOD currently yields 7.57% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EOD and VXUS share 19 holdings out of 8176 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOD or VXUS?
EOD has an expense ratio of 1.37% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $132 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EOD or VXUS?
Over the past year EOD returned +28.17% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so EOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EOD annualized -2.87% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EOD or VXUS?
EOD has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EOD -85.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EOD and VXUS?
EOD and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EOD and VXUS?
EOD and VXUS share 19 common holdings with a 2.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8176 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOD or VXUS?
EOD yields 7.57% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so EOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.