EOD vs IVV
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOD | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.37% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $315M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.57% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 397 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +19.90% | +12.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.30% | +20.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.46% | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.02% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -85.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2007 | May 15, 2000 |
EOD vs IVV Performance
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EOD returned +29.30% while IVV returned +20.70%. Year to date, EOD is up 19.90% versus a gain of 12.96% for IVV.
Over three years, EOD compounded at +27.46% per year against +22.10% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.02% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs -2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.6% for EOD and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOD charges 1.37% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $137 vs $3 annually, a gap of $134 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOD currently yields 7.57% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
EOD and IVV share 28 holdings out of 803 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOD or IVV?
EOD has an expense ratio of 1.37% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $134 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EOD or IVV?
Over the past year EOD returned +29.30% vs +20.70% for IVV, so EOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EOD annualized -2.87% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EOD or IVV?
EOD has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EOD -85.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EOD and IVV?
EOD and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EOD and IVV?
EOD and IVV share 28 common holdings with a 26.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 803 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOD or IVV?
EOD yields 7.57% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.