EOD vs VYM
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOD | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.37% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $315M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.57% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 397 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +19.90% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.17% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.21% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.84% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -85.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EOD vs VYM Performance
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EOD returned +28.17% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, EOD is up 19.90% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, EOD compounded at +27.21% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.84% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs -2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.6% for EOD and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOD charges 1.37% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $137 vs $4 annually, a gap of $133 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOD currently yields 7.57% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EOD and VYM share 18 holdings out of 911 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOD or VYM?
EOD has an expense ratio of 1.37% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $133 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EOD or VYM?
Over the past year EOD returned +28.17% vs +24.22% for VYM, so EOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EOD annualized -2.87% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EOD or VYM?
EOD has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EOD -85.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EOD and VYM?
EOD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EOD and VYM?
EOD and VYM share 18 common holdings with a 8.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 911 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOD or VYM?
EOD yields 7.57% while VYM yields 2.24%, so EOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.