EOD vs VTI
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.37% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $315M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 397 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.90% | +13.38% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.30% | +21.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.46% | +21.85% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.02% | +12.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -85.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
EOD vs VTI Performance
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EOD returned +29.30% while VTI returned +21.12%. Year to date, EOD is up 19.90% versus a gain of 13.38% for VTI.
Over three years, EOD compounded at +27.46% per year against +21.85% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.02% and +12.44% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.10% annualized vs -2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.6% for EOD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOD charges 1.37% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $137 vs $3 annually, a gap of $134 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOD currently yields 7.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EOD and VTI share 39 holdings out of 3074 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOD or VTI?
EOD has an expense ratio of 1.37% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $134 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EOD or VTI?
Over the past year EOD returned +29.30% vs +21.12% for VTI, so EOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), EOD annualized -2.87% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EOD or VTI?
EOD has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EOD -85.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EOD and VTI?
EOD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EOD and VTI?
EOD and VTI share 39 common holdings with a 25.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3074 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOD or VTI?
EOD yields 7.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.