EOD vs VOO
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOD | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.37% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $315M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.57% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 397 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +20.08% | +13.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.49% | +21.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.47% | +22.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.01% | +13.31% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -85.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EOD vs VOO Performance
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EOD returned +29.49% while VOO returned +21.53%. Year to date, EOD is up 20.08% versus a gain of 13.73% for VOO.
Over three years, EOD compounded at +27.47% per year against +22.60% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.01% and +13.31% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs -2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.6% for EOD and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOD charges 1.37% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $137 vs $3 annually, a gap of $134 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOD currently yields 7.57% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
EOD and VOO share 28 holdings out of 803 unique holdings combined, representing a 26.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOD or VOO?
EOD has an expense ratio of 1.37% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $134 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EOD or VOO?
Over the past year EOD returned +29.49% vs +21.53% for VOO, so EOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), EOD annualized -2.86% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EOD or VOO?
EOD has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EOD -85.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EOD and VOO?
EOD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EOD and VOO?
EOD and VOO share 28 common holdings with a 26.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 803 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOD or VOO?
EOD yields 7.57% while VOO yields 1.08%, so EOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.