EOD vs SCHD
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. EOD offers more diversification with 397 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOD | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.37% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $315M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.57% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 397 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +19.90% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.17% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.21% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.84% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -85.6% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2007 | Oct 20, 2011 |
EOD vs SCHD Performance
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EOD returned +28.17% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, EOD is up 19.90% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, EOD compounded at +27.21% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +12.84% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.51% annualized vs -2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.6% for EOD and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOD charges 1.37% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $137 vs $6 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOD currently yields 7.57% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
EOD and SCHD share 4 holdings out of 422 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOD or SCHD?
EOD has an expense ratio of 1.37% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $131 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EOD or SCHD?
Over the past year EOD returned +28.17% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), EOD annualized -2.87% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EOD or SCHD?
EOD has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EOD -85.6% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EOD and SCHD?
EOD and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EOD and SCHD?
EOD and SCHD share 4 common holdings with a 3.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 422 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOD or SCHD?
EOD yields 7.57% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so EOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.