EOD vs QQQ
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EOD or QQQ?
Allocation/Balanced against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EOD led over 1Y and 3Y, QQQ over 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EOD | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.37% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $311M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.57% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 397 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +17.22%Best | +15.86% |
| 1Y Return | +24.87%Best | +22.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.00%Best | +24.15% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.40% | +14.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 18.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -85.6% | -53.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,940 | $19,390Best |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Allocation/Balanced | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2007 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 28, 2007 to Sep 10, 2026 (19.5 years).
EOD vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EOD vs QQQ Performance
Allspring Global Dividend Opportunity Fund (EOD) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EOD returned +24.87% while QQQ returned +22.63%. Year to date, EOD is up 17.22% versus a gain of 15.86% for QQQ.
Over three years, EOD compounded at +26.00% per year against +24.15% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.40% and +14.16% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +15.61% annualized vs -2.97%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 18.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.6% for EOD and -53.5% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EOD charges 1.37% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $137 vs $18 annually, a gap of $119 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EOD currently yields 7.57% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 43.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings EOD also owns.
Only one direction is shown: for EOD, our book for it lists positions totalling 114.2% of the fund, which is what a leveraged book looks like and is not a denominator we can divide by.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 186 days apart, EOD as of Jan 31, 2026 and QQQ as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 326 positions we hold weights for in EOD and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 397 and 107.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EOD | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.55% | 8.44% | 3.89% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.18% | 7.27% | 4.09% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 2.91% | 5.76% | 2.85% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.54% | 3.36% | 0.18% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.11% | 4.67% | 2.56% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.99% | 3.16% | 1.17% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.47% | 2.78% | 1.31% |
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 1.79% | 2.41% | 0.62% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.05% | 2.56% | 1.51% |
| KLACKla Corp. | 1.32% | 1.11% | 0.21% |
43.3% of QQQ is already inside EOD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EOD or QQQ?
EOD has an expense ratio of 1.37% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $119 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EOD or QQQ?
Over the past year EOD returned +24.87% vs +22.63% for QQQ, so EOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), EOD annualized -2.97% vs +15.61% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EOD or QQQ?
EOD has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 18.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: EOD -85.6% vs QQQ -53.5%.
Should I hold both EOD and QQQ?
EOD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EOD and QQQ?
At least 43.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings EOD also owns. Our book for EOD is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 326 positions we hold weights for in EOD and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, EOD or QQQ?
EOD yields 7.57% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EOD?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EOD led over 1Y and 3Y, QQQ over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.