ESGU vs IVV
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ESGU or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. ESGU is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESGU | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $18.0B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 282 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +11.46% | +11.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.83% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.60% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.42% | +12.66%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Tie | -33.9%Tie |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,172 | $18,149Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.4%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2016 to Sep 15, 2026 (9.8 years).
ESGU vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.8 years both funds cover.
ESGU vs IVV Performance
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ESGU returned +15.83% while IVV returned +15.96%. Year to date, ESGU is up 11.46% versus a gain of 11.51% for IVV.
Over three years, ESGU compounded at +20.60% per year against +21.01% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.42% and +12.66% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.28% annualized vs +14.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ESGU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for ESGU and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESGU charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESGU currently yields 0.91% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
95.5% of ESGU's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 83.9% of IVV's money is in holdings ESGU also owns.
Most of ESGU is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
238 positions in common, counted across the 267 positions we hold weights for in ESGU and 490 in IVV, against full books of 282 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 246 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ESGU (14.8% of the fund), and 23 for ESGU that do not appear in IVV (3.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ESGU | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.67% | 8.07% | 0.40% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.90% | 7.02% | 0.12% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.44% | 5.69% | 0.25% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.70% | 3.84% | 0.14% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.41% | 2.39% | 1.02% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.55% | 2.65% | 0.10% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.88% | 3.00% | 1.12% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.74% | 1.90% | 0.16% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.59% | 1.63% | 0.04% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 1.56% | 0.00% |
95.5% of ESGU is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESGU or IVV?
ESGU has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ESGU or IVV?
Over the past year ESGU returned +15.83% vs +15.96% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), ESGU annualized +14.27% vs +14.28% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ESGU or IVV?
ESGU has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ESGU -33.9% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ESGU and IVV?
ESGU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ESGU and IVV?
95.5% of ESGU's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 83.9% of IVV's is in holdings ESGU also owns. They hold 238 positions in common, counted across the 267 positions we hold weights for in ESGU and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESGU or IVV?
ESGU yields 0.91% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ESGU?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. ESGU is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.