ESUM vs IVV
Eventide US Market ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ESUM or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. ESUM is less concentrated, with 22.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESUM | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $193M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 204 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +11.18%Best | +11.03% |
| 1Y Return | +12.07% | +15.62%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.61% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $12,426 | $13,050Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.8%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Eventide | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.7 years).
ESUM vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
ESUM vs IVV Performance
Eventide US Market ETF (ESUM) is an ETF from Eventide and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ESUM returned +12.07% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, ESUM is up 11.18% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.0% for ESUM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for ESUM and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESUM charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESUM currently yields 0.94% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
82.6% of ESUM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 31.9% of IVV's money is in holdings ESUM also owns.
Most of ESUM is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
133 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in ESUM and 490 in IVV, against full books of 204 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 350 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ESUM (66.7% of the fund), and 57 for ESUM that do not appear in IVV (13.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ESUM | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.50% | 8.07% | 0.57% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 2.65% | 0.00% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.89% | 1.63% | 0.26% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 2.01% | 1.01% | 1.00% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.56% | 1.38% | 0.18% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.58% | 1.16% | 0.42% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 1.38% | 0.49% | 0.89% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.65% | 0.17% | 1.48% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 1.12% | 0.57% | 0.55% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 1.35% | 0.27% | 1.08% |
82.6% of ESUM is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESUM or IVV?
ESUM has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ESUM or IVV?
Over the past year ESUM returned +12.07% vs +15.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ESUM annualized +13.63% vs +16.95% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ESUM or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.0% for ESUM. Worst drawdown: ESUM -17.7% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both ESUM and IVV?
ESUM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ESUM and IVV?
82.6% of ESUM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 31.9% of IVV's is in holdings ESUM also owns. They hold 133 positions in common, counted across the 203 positions we hold weights for in ESUM and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESUM or IVV?
ESUM yields 0.94% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ESUM?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. ESUM is less concentrated, with 22.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.