ESUM vs VTI
Eventide US Market ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ESUM or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. ESUM is less concentrated, with 22.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ESUM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $190M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.97% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 404 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +9.24%Best | +8.54% |
| 1Y Return | +10.01% | +11.14%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 12.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $12,300 | $12,793Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.9%Best | 34.6% |
| Fund Family | Eventide | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 18, 2024 to Nov 6, 2026 (1.9 years).
ESUM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
ESUM vs VTI Performance
Eventide US Market ETF (ESUM) is an ETF from Eventide and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ESUM returned +10.01% while VTI returned +11.14%. Year to date, ESUM is up 9.24% versus a gain of 8.54% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 11.8% for ESUM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for ESUM and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ESUM charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ESUM currently yields 0.97% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.6% of ESUM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.5% of VTI's money is in holdings ESUM also owns.
Most of ESUM is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
193 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ESUM and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 404 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 943 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ESUM (66.5% of the fund), and 0 for ESUM that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ESUM | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.06% | 7.13% | 0.07% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.33% | 2.28% | 0.05% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.79% | 1.64% | 0.15% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 1.91% | 1.34% | 0.57% |
| XOMExxonmobil Holdings Corp Common Stock Usd | 2.29% | 0.92% | 1.37% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.73% | 1.36% | 0.37% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1.71% | 0.14% | 1.57% |
| HDHome Depot Inc | 1.42% | 0.39% | 1.03% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 1.41% | 0.22% | 1.19% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.30% | 0.30% | 1.00% |
96.6% of ESUM is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ESUM or VTI?
ESUM has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ESUM or VTI?
Over the past year ESUM returned +10.01% vs +11.14% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), ESUM annualized +11.51% vs +13.84% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ESUM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 11.8% for ESUM. Worst drawdown: ESUM -17.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both ESUM and VTI?
ESUM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ESUM and VTI?
96.6% of ESUM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.5% of VTI's is in holdings ESUM also owns. They hold 193 positions in common, counted across the 202 positions we hold weights for in ESUM and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ESUM or VTI?
ESUM yields 0.97% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ESUM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. ESUM is less concentrated, with 22.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.