EXEQ vs VOO

EXEQ vs VOO

Which is better, EXEQ or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.9%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEXEQVOO
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$1M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.09%1.04%
Holdings52509
YTD Return+7.06%+12.23%Best
1Y Return-+15.47%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.78%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.71%
Top 10 Weight40.9%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyWedbush FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 13, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

EXEQ vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

EXEQ vs VOO Performance

Wedbush ReturnOnLeadership US Large-Cap ETF (EXEQ) is an ETF from Wedbush Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, EXEQ is up 7.06% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EXEQ charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EXEQ currently yields 0.09% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

EXEQ already in VOO79.5%
VOO already in EXEQ18.4%

79.5% of EXEQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 18.4% of VOO's money is in holdings EXEQ also owns.

Most of EXEQ is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

41 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in EXEQ and 494 in VOO, against full books of 52 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 446 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EXEQ (80.8% of the fund), and 8 for EXEQ that do not appear in VOO (12.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EXEQWeight in VOODifference
DALDl Co., Ltd.8.69%0.09%8.60%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.17%5.36%2.19%
UALUnited Airlines Holdings Inc.6.20%0.06%6.14%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.03%3.24%1.21%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.01%2.62%0.61%
EOGEog Resources Inc3.27%0.12%3.15%
VRTXNvaesrtex Pharmaceuticals Inc2.85%0.19%2.66%
EQTEQT Corp.2.91%0.05%2.86%
RCLRoyal Caribbean Cruises2.80%0.12%2.68%
ABBVAbbvie Inc.2.14%0.69%1.45%

79.5% of EXEQ is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

EXEQVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EXEQ or VOO?

EXEQ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between EXEQ and VOO?

79.5% of EXEQ's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 18.4% of VOO's is in holdings EXEQ also owns. They hold 41 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in EXEQ and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, EXEQ or VOO?

EXEQ yields 0.09% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than EXEQ?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.