FELG vs VTI
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FELG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FELG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $5.4B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 267 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | -0.95% | +11.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | -2.38% | +12.01%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.40% | +21.03%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.44% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.9% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $16,598 | $17,237Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.9% | 34.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 20, 2023 to Nov 9, 2026 (3 years).
FELG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
FELG vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FELG returned -2.38% while VTI returned +12.01%. Year to date, FELG is down 0.95% versus a gain of 11.23% for VTI.
Over three years, FELG compounded at +18.40% per year against +21.03% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FELG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 11.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.9% for FELG and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FELG charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FELG currently yields 0.37% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
99.7% of FELG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 54.5% of VTI's money is in holdings FELG also owns.
Most of FELG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
124 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in FELG and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 267 and 3,542.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,012 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FELG (42.5% of the fund), and 4 for FELG that do not appear in VTI (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FELG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 15.59% | 7.13% | 8.46% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 8.65% | 6.63% | 2.02% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.37% | 5.19% | 0.18% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 7.76% | 2.76% | 5.00% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.85% | 2.28% | 2.57% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.89% | 2.18% | 1.71% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 3.10% | 2.18% | 0.92% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.45% | 1.64% | 1.81% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co | 3.59% | 1.34% | 2.25% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.64% | 1.36% | 1.28% |
99.7% of FELG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FELG or VTI?
FELG has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FELG or VTI?
Over the past year FELG returned -2.38% vs +12.01% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FELG or VTI?
FELG has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 11.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FELG -23.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both FELG and VTI?
FELG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FELG and VTI?
99.7% of FELG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 54.5% of VTI's is in holdings FELG also owns. They hold 124 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in FELG and 3,464 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FELG or VTI?
FELG yields 0.37% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FELG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 34.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.