FELG vs VTI
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FELG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5.5B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 153 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.24% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.96% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 20, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
FELG vs VTI Performance
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FELG returned +14.96% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, FELG is up 8.24% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FELG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.9% for FELG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FELG charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FELG currently yields 0.36% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FELG and VTI share 124 holdings out of 2805 unique holdings combined, representing a 48.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FELG or VTI?
FELG has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FELG or VTI?
Over the past year FELG returned +14.96% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), FELG annualized +24.13% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FELG or VTI?
FELG has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FELG -23.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FELG and VTI?
FELG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FELG and VTI?
FELG and VTI share 124 common holdings with a 48.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2805 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FELG or VTI?
FELG yields 0.36% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.