FESC vs FLQS
First Eagle Small Cap Equity ETF vs Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Which is better, FESC or FLQS?
FLQS costs less.
FLQS has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FESC | FLQS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.35%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $48M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.49% |
| Holdings | 355 | 562 |
| YTD Return | -9.37% | +11.62%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +14.72% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.07% |
| Fund Family | First Eagle Investments | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2026 | Apr 26, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
FESC vs FLQS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
FESC vs FLQS Performance
First Eagle Small Cap Equity ETF (FESC) is an ETF from First Eagle Investments and Franklin US Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Year to date, FESC is down 9.37% versus a gain of 11.62% for FLQS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FESC charges 0.55% per year while FLQS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $35 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FESC currently yields 0.00% against 1.49% for FLQS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 174 holdings in FESC and 37 in FLQS, totalling 96.9% and 56.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 174 positions we hold weights for in FESC and 37 in FLQS, against full books of 355 and 562.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FESC and FLQS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FESC or FLQS?
FESC has an expense ratio of 0.55% while FLQS charges 0.35%. FLQS is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, FESC or FLQS?
FESC yields 0.00% while FLQS yields 1.49%, so FLQS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLQS better than FESC?
FLQS has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.