FFA vs SPY

FFA vs SPY

Which is better, FFA or SPY?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.7%.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: SPYLess Concentrated: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFFASPY
Expense Ratio1.13%0.09%Best
AUM$514M$814.4B
Dividend Yield6.19%1.01%
Holdings86505
YTD Return+10.34%+13.34%Best
1Y Return+17.22%+19.97%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+16.82%+21.20%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+9.12%+12.81%Best
Volatility (annualized)16.6%14.8%Best
Max Drawdown-67.6%-56.5%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,471$18,270Best
Top 10 Weight47.7%38.0%Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 26, 2004Jan 22, 1993

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 4, 2004 to Sep 4, 2026 (21.9 years).

FFA vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.9 years both funds cover.

FFA vs SPY Performance

First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund (FFA) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year FFA returned +17.22% while SPY returned +19.97%. Year to date, FFA is up 10.34% versus a gain of 13.34% for SPY.

Over three years, FFA compounded at +16.82% per year against +21.20% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +9.12% and +12.81% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +9.48% annualized vs +2.49%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FFA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.8% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.6% for FFA and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FFA charges 1.13% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $113 vs $9 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFA currently yields 6.19% against 1.01% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

FFA already in SPY91.0%
SPY already in FFA48.0%

91.0% of FFA's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 48.0% of SPY's money is in holdings FFA also owns.

Most of FFA is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

53 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in FFA and 504 in SPY, against full books of 86 and 505.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 443 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for FFA (51.4% of the fund), and 7 for FFA that do not appear in SPY (5.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FFAWeight in SPYDifference
AAPLApple, Inc9.34%6.83%2.51%
NVDANvidia Corp.7.31%7.71%0.40%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 376.67%5.50%1.17%
GOOGAlphabet Inc. C7.17%2.67%4.50%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.95%2.97%0.98%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc2.66%4.08%1.42%
JPMJpmorgan Chase4.05%1.44%2.61%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.19%1.33%0.86%
METAMeta Platform Inc 1.01%1.94%0.93%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.41%1.51%0.10%

91.0% of FFA is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FFASPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FFA or SPY?

FFA has an expense ratio of 1.13% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $104 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, FFA or SPY?

Over the past year FFA returned +17.22% vs +19.97% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), FFA annualized +2.49% vs +9.48% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, FFA or SPY?

FFA has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.8% for SPY. Worst drawdown: FFA -67.6% vs SPY -56.5%.

Should I hold both FFA and SPY?

FFA and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between FFA and SPY?

91.0% of FFA's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 48.0% of SPY's is in holdings FFA also owns. They hold 53 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in FFA and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, FFA or SPY?

FFA yields 6.19% while SPY yields 1.01%, so FFA currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than FFA?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.