FFLV vs HUSV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 105 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | HUSV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $16M | $74M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.41% | 1.37% | |
| Holdings | 119 | 101 | |
| YTD Return | +17.97% | +8.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.15% | +5.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +6.22% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 13.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -35.7% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2024 | Aug 24, 2016 |
FFLV vs HUSV Performance
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Domestic ETF (HUSV) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year FFLV returned +32.15% while HUSV returned +5.89%. Year to date, FFLV is up 17.97% versus a gain of 8.58% for HUSV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HUSV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 12.3% for FFLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for FFLV and -35.7% for HUSV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFLV charges 0.38% per year while HUSV charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $70 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFLV currently yields 1.41% against 1.37% for HUSV.
Holdings Overlap
FFLV and HUSV share 20 holdings out of 186 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFLV or HUSV?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while HUSV charges 0.70%. FFLV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFLV or HUSV?
Over the past year FFLV returned +32.15% vs +5.89% for HUSV, so FFLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FFLV annualized +17.62% vs +8.52% for HUSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFLV or HUSV?
HUSV has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 12.3% for FFLV. Worst drawdown: FFLV -16.7% vs HUSV -35.7%.
Should I hold both FFLV and HUSV?
FFLV and HUSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFLV and HUSV?
FFLV and HUSV share 20 common holdings with a 19.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 186 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFLV or HUSV?
FFLV yields 1.41% while HUSV yields 1.37%, so FFLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.