FLV vs SCHD
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, FLV or SCHD?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FLV led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $384M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.51% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 56 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +15.77% | +28.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.29% | +31.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.73%Best | +16.70% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.00% | +10.09%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 14.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1%Best | -16.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,105 | $16,171Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.6%Best | 41.5% |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2020 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 2, 2020 to Sep 3, 2026 (6.4 years).
FLV vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.4 years both funds cover.
FLV vs SCHD Performance
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year FLV returned +20.29% while SCHD returned +31.77%. Year to date, FLV is up 15.77% versus a gain of 28.59% for SCHD.
Over three years, FLV compounded at +16.73% per year against +16.70% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +10.00% and +10.09% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +17.72% annualized vs +15.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 13.2% for FLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for FLV and -16.9% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLV charges 0.42% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $6 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLV currently yields 1.51% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
14.2% of FLV's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 21.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings FLV also owns.
SCHD and FLV share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 56 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 91 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for FLV (78.0% of the fund), and 38 for FLV that do not appear in SCHD (77.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FLV | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 2.22% | 4.11% | 1.89% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.22% | 3.74% | 1.52% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 2.04% | 3.71% | 1.67% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.45% | 3.84% | 3.39% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.70% | 1.36% | 1.34% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.89% | 2.55% | 1.66% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp. | 2.45% | 0.91% | 1.54% |
| TGTTarget Corp-1477 | 1.19% | 1.70% | 0.51% |
21.9% of SCHD is already inside FLV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLV or SCHD?
FLV has an expense ratio of 0.42% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FLV or SCHD?
Over the past year FLV returned +20.29% vs +31.77% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FLV annualized +15.82% vs +17.72% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FLV or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 13.2% for FLV. Worst drawdown: FLV -15.1% vs SCHD -16.9%.
Should I hold both FLV and SCHD?
FLV and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FLV and SCHD?
21.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings FLV also owns. 21.9% of SCHD's is in holdings FLV also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in FLV and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLV or SCHD?
FLV yields 1.51% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than FLV?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. FLV led over 3Y, SCHD over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. FLV is less concentrated, with 32.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.