FLV vs VOO
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FLV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $364M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +15.68% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.57% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.86% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.30% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FLV vs VOO Performance
American Century Focused Large Cap Value ETF (FLV) is a ETF from American Century ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FLV returned +23.57% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, FLV is up 15.68% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, FLV compounded at +15.86% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +10.30% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FLV has the edge at +16.01% annualized vs +13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.3% for FLV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for FLV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FLV charges 0.42% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FLV currently yields 1.59% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FLV and VOO share 44 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 19.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FLV or VOO?
FLV has an expense ratio of 0.42% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FLV or VOO?
Over the past year FLV returned +23.57% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FLV annualized +16.01% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FLV or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.3% for FLV. Worst drawdown: FLV -15.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FLV and VOO?
FLV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FLV and VOO?
FLV and VOO share 44 common holdings with a 19.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FLV or VOO?
FLV yields 1.59% while VOO yields 1.09%, so FLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.