FSCC vs VXUS
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. FSCC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSCC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $309M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.22% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 302 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.97% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.94% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -27.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FSCC vs VXUS Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is a ETF from Federated Hermes and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FSCC returned +33.94% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, FSCC is up 18.97% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FSCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.2% for FSCC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSCC charges 0.36% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $5 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSCC currently yields 0.22% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FSCC and VXUS share 4 holdings out of 8166 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSCC or VXUS?
FSCC has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FSCC or VXUS?
Over the past year FSCC returned +33.94% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so FSCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FSCC annualized +18.43% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FSCC or VXUS?
FSCC has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FSCC -27.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FSCC and VXUS?
FSCC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FSCC and VXUS?
FSCC and VXUS share 4 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8166 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSCC or VXUS?
FSCC yields 0.22% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.