FSCC vs VYM
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FSCC or VYM?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. FSCC is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FSCC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $427M | $83.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 622 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +12.14%Best | +11.86% |
| 1Y Return | +15.64% | +16.81%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 10.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.2% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $13,277 | $13,556Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.8%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 30, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 31, 2024 to Oct 13, 2026 (2.2 years).
FSCC vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
FSCC vs VYM Performance
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) is an ETF from Federated Hermes and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FSCC returned +15.64% while VYM returned +16.81%. Year to date, FSCC is up 12.14% versus a gain of 11.86% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FSCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 10.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.2% for FSCC and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FSCC charges 0.36% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $4 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FSCC currently yields 0.23% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
15.1% of FSCC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's money is in holdings FSCC also owns.
FSCC and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, FSCC as of Sep 15, 2026 and VYM as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
39 positions in common, counted across the 310 positions we hold weights for in FSCC and 557 in VYM, against full books of 622 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 490 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for FSCC (96.4% of the fund), and 255 for FSCC that do not appear in VYM (80.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FSCC | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BKUBankunited Inc | 1.06% | 0.01% | 1.05% |
| CNOCno Financial Group Inc | 1.00% | 0.02% | 0.98% |
| PRGOPerrigo Company Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.88% | 0.01% | 0.87% |
| DKDelek Us Holdings Inc | 0.80% | 0.02% | 0.78% |
| KLICKulicke & Soffa Industries | 0.64% | 0.02% | 0.62% |
| JXNJackson Financial Inc USD | 0.63% | 0.03% | 0.60% |
| PORPortland General | 0.60% | 0.02% | 0.58% |
| MCYMercury General Corp | 0.60% | 0.01% | 0.59% |
| ASBAssociated Banc-Corp | 0.59% | 0.02% | 0.57% |
| AMBPArdagh Metal Packaging Sa | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.60% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FSCC and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FSCC or VYM?
FSCC has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FSCC or VYM?
Over the past year FSCC returned +15.64% vs +16.81% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FSCC annualized +13.75% vs +14.83% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FSCC or VYM?
FSCC has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 10.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FSCC -27.2% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both FSCC and VYM?
FSCC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FSCC and VYM?
15.1% of FSCC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's is in holdings FSCC also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 310 positions we hold weights for in FSCC and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FSCC or VYM?
FSCC yields 0.23% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FSCC?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. FSCC is less concentrated, with 11.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.