FTRI vs IVV
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. FTRI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTRI | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $124M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.09% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 61 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +10.76% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.80% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.90% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.31% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -84.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2010 | May 15, 2000 |
FTRI vs IVV Performance
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FTRI returned +22.80% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, FTRI is up 10.76% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, FTRI compounded at +14.90% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +9.31% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs -1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTRI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.4% for FTRI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTRI charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTRI currently yields 2.09% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FTRI and IVV share 5 holdings out of 551 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTRI or IVV?
FTRI has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FTRI or IVV?
Over the past year FTRI returned +22.80% vs +21.79% for IVV, so FTRI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), FTRI annualized -1.66% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FTRI or IVV?
FTRI has been the more volatile fund at 27.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FTRI -84.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FTRI and IVV?
FTRI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FTRI and IVV?
FTRI and IVV share 5 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 551 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTRI or IVV?
FTRI yields 2.09% while IVV yields 1.10%, so FTRI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.