FTRI vs VTI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FTRI or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FTRI | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $119M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.89% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 122 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +6.58% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.16% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.58% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.00% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.1% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -84.4% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,105 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 12, 2010 to Oct 2, 2026 (16.6 years).
FTRI vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.6 years both funds cover.
FTRI vs VTI Performance
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF (FTRI) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FTRI returned +13.16% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, FTRI is up 6.58% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, FTRI compounded at +14.58% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.00% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.42% annualized vs -1.88%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FTRI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.1% compared with 14.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -84.4% for FTRI and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FTRI charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FTRI currently yields 1.89% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
16.6% of FTRI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings FTRI also owns.
FTRI and VTI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, FTRI as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
13 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTRI and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 122 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,142 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for FTRI (97.3% of the fund), and 4 for FTRI that do not appear in VTI (11.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FTRI | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AWKAmerican Water Works Co. Inc. | 3.92% | 0.04% | 3.88% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 2.97% | 0.03% | 2.94% |
| WYWeyerhaeuser Co. | 2.27% | 0.03% | 2.24% |
| WTRGEssential Utilities Inc - Common | 1.70% | 0.02% | 1.68% |
| AESAes Corporation | 1.51% | 0.01% | 1.50% |
| MOSMosaic Co | 1.16% | 0.01% | 1.15% |
| BKHBlack Hills Corp | 0.79% | 0.01% | 0.78% |
| UFPIUniversal Forest Products Inc | 0.64% | 0.01% | 0.63% |
| CWTCalifornia Water Service Group | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| NOGNorthern Oil And Gas Inc | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.39% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FTRI and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FTRI or VTI?
FTRI has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FTRI or VTI?
Over the past year FTRI returned +13.16% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), FTRI annualized -1.88% vs +12.42% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FTRI or VTI?
FTRI has been the more volatile fund at 27.1% annualized versus 14.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FTRI -84.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FTRI and VTI?
FTRI and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FTRI and VTI?
16.6% of FTRI's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings FTRI also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in FTRI and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FTRI or VTI?
FTRI yields 1.89% while VTI yields 1.03%, so FTRI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FTRI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.