GFLW vs QQQ
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GFLW delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFLW | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +20.55% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.65% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GFLW vs QQQ Performance
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GFLW returned +27.65% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, GFLW is up 20.55% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 19.6% for GFLW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for GFLW and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFLW charges 0.39% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $18 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFLW currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GFLW and QQQ share 29 holdings out of 173 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFLW or QQQ?
GFLW has an expense ratio of 0.39% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $21 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GFLW or QQQ?
Over the past year GFLW returned +27.65% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so GFLW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GFLW annualized +19.05% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GFLW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 19.6% for GFLW. Worst drawdown: GFLW -24.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GFLW and QQQ?
GFLW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GFLW and QQQ?
GFLW and QQQ share 29 common holdings with a 22.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 173 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFLW or QQQ?
GFLW yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.