GFLW vs VOO
GFLW vs VOO
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. GFLW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFLW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $880M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +19.03% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.01% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GFLW vs VOO Performance
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GFLW returned +25.01% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, GFLW is up 19.03% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for GFLW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFLW charges 0.39% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFLW currently yields 0.01% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GFLW and VOO share 55 holdings out of 550 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GFLW | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 3.68% | 7.51% | 3.83% |
| AVGO | 2.42% | 2.77% | 0.35% |
| CAT | 3.35% | 0.76% | 2.59% |
| LLY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMAT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| DELL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| SNDK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LRCX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GEV | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| KLAC | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings GFLW shares with VOO Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFLW or VOO?
GFLW has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GFLW or VOO?
Over the past year GFLW returned +25.01% vs +23.71% for VOO, so GFLW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GFLW annualized +18.62% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GFLW or VOO?
GFLW has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GFLW -24.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GFLW and VOO?
GFLW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GFLW and VOO?
GFLW and VOO share 55 common holdings with a 18.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 550 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFLW or VOO?
GFLW yields 0.01% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.