GFLW vs IVV
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GFLW delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFLW | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +19.80% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.61% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
GFLW vs IVV Performance
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GFLW returned +26.61% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, GFLW is up 19.80% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for GFLW and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFLW charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFLW currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GFLW and IVV share 54 holdings out of 551 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFLW or IVV?
GFLW has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GFLW or IVV?
Over the past year GFLW returned +26.61% vs +20.94% for IVV, so GFLW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GFLW annualized +18.65% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GFLW or IVV?
GFLW has been the more volatile fund at 19.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GFLW -24.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GFLW and IVV?
GFLW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GFLW and IVV?
GFLW and IVV share 54 common holdings with a 16.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 551 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFLW or IVV?
GFLW yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.