GFLW vs IVV
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GFLW or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GFLW led over the full window, IVV over 1Y. GFLW is less concentrated, with 26.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFLW | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 102 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.27%Best | +12.51% |
| 1Y Return | +16.60% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.3% | 12.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,172Best | $12,907 |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.5%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 4, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.8 years).
GFLW vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
GFLW vs IVV Performance
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GFLW returned +16.60% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, GFLW is up 17.27% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.3% compared with 12.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for GFLW and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFLW charges 0.39% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFLW currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
70.6% of GFLW's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 21.8% of IVV's money is in holdings GFLW also owns.
Most of GFLW is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
55 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in GFLW and 505 in IVV, against full books of 102 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 440 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GFLW (77.5% of the fund), and 43 for GFLW that do not appear in IVV (26.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GFLW | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 3.92% | 7.98% | 4.06% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.52% | 2.98% | 0.46% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 3.19% | 0.60% | 2.59% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.26% | 1.39% | 0.87% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc. | 3.08% | 0.20% | 2.88% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 2.38% | 0.64% | 1.74% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 2.61% | 0.30% | 2.31% |
| LRCXLam Research Corpcommon Stock | 2.27% | 0.58% | 1.69% |
| GEVGE Vernova, LLC | 2.15% | 0.41% | 1.74% |
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 2.14% | 0.17% | 1.97% |
70.6% of GFLW is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFLW or IVV?
GFLW has an expense ratio of 0.39% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GFLW or IVV?
Over the past year GFLW returned +16.60% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GFLW annualized +16.54% vs +15.23% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GFLW or IVV?
GFLW has been the more volatile fund at 19.3% annualized versus 12.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GFLW -24.1% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both GFLW and IVV?
GFLW and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GFLW and IVV?
70.6% of GFLW's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 21.8% of IVV's is in holdings GFLW also owns. They hold 55 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in GFLW and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFLW or IVV?
GFLW yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GFLW?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. GFLW led over the full window, IVV over 1Y. GFLW is less concentrated, with 26.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.