GFLW vs VYM
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GFLW or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GFLW led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. GFLW is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GFLW | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $1.1B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 102 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +16.25%Best | +12.87% |
| 1Y Return | +16.00% | +17.25%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.66% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.98% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.4% | 9.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.1% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $13,032Best | $12,752 |
| Top 10 Weight | 25.9%Best | 26.1% |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 4, 2024 to Sep 15, 2026 (1.8 years).
GFLW vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
GFLW vs VYM Performance
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GFLW returned +16.00% while VYM returned +17.25%. Year to date, GFLW is up 16.25% versus a gain of 12.87% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GFLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.4% compared with 9.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.1% for GFLW and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GFLW charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GFLW currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
12.5% of GFLW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.0% of VYM's money is in holdings GFLW also owns.
GFLW and VYM share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in GFLW and 557 in VYM, against full books of 102 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 522 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GFLW (87.1% of the fund), and 92 for GFLW that do not appear in VYM (84.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GFLW and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GFLW or VYM?
GFLW has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GFLW or VYM?
Over the past year GFLW returned +16.00% vs +17.25% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GFLW annualized +15.85% vs +14.46% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GFLW or VYM?
GFLW has been the more volatile fund at 19.4% annualized versus 9.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GFLW -24.1% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both GFLW and VYM?
GFLW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GFLW and VYM?
12.5% of GFLW's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.0% of VYM's is in holdings GFLW also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in GFLW and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GFLW or VYM?
GFLW yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GFLW?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GFLW led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. GFLW is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.