GINN vs IVV
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GINN | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $202M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.17% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 485 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.70% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.37% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.53% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.50% | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -41.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
GINN vs IVV Performance
Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) is a ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GINN returned +20.37% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, GINN is up 11.70% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, GINN compounded at +19.53% per year against +21.55% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.50% and +13.27% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, GINN has the edge at +9.53% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GINN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.3% for GINN and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GINN charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GINN currently yields 1.17% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GINN and IVV share 133 holdings out of 840 unique holdings combined, representing a 35.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GINN or IVV?
GINN has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GINN or IVV?
Over the past year GINN returned +20.37% vs +21.64% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), GINN annualized +9.53% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GINN or IVV?
GINN has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GINN -41.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GINN and IVV?
GINN and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GINN and IVV?
GINN and IVV share 133 common holdings with a 35.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 840 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GINN or IVV?
GINN yields 1.17% while IVV yields 1.09%, so GINN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.