GK vs QQQ
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GK or QQQ?
Nearly the same fund. QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $31M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 31 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +9.97% | +15.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.99% | +19.78%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.53% | +24.58%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.00% | +13.93%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.2% | 20.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -47.7% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,041 | $19,195Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.8% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 2, 2021 to Sep 16, 2026 (5.2 years).
GK vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
GK vs QQQ Performance
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GK returned +7.99% while QQQ returned +19.78%. Year to date, GK is up 9.97% versus a gain of 15.21% for QQQ.
Over three years, GK compounded at +18.53% per year against +24.58% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +2.00% and +13.93% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 20.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.7% for GK and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GK charges 0.77% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $18 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GK currently yields 0.07% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
53.0% of GK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 39.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings GK also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in GK and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 31 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 85 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GK (58.0% of the fund), and 17 for GK that do not appear in QQQ (45.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GK | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.83% | 8.44% | 0.61% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 9.05% | 4.43% | 4.62% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.03% | 7.27% | 2.24% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 8.25% | 3.13% | 5.12% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.22% | 5.76% | 0.54% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.83% | 4.67% | 0.84% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.02% | 3.16% | 1.86% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 4.70% | 1.37% | 3.33% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 2.88% | 0.94% | 1.94% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.19% | 0.51% |
53.0% of GK is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GK or QQQ?
GK has an expense ratio of 0.77% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GK or QQQ?
Over the past year GK returned +7.99% vs +19.78% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GK or QQQ?
GK has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 20.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: GK -47.7% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both GK and QQQ?
GK and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GK and QQQ?
53.0% of GK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 39.6% of QQQ's is in holdings GK also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in GK and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, GK or QQQ?
GK yields 0.07% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GK?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.