GK vs IVV
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GK or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GK | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.77% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $31M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 31 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +10.50% | +12.01%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.81% | +16.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.47% | +21.21%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.36% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.2% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -47.7% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,237 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.8% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Advisor Shares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 1, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 2, 2021 to Sep 14, 2026 (5.2 years).
GK vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.
GK vs IVV Performance
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an ETF from Advisor Shares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GK returned +8.81% while IVV returned +16.48%. Year to date, GK is up 10.50% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.
Over three years, GK compounded at +18.47% per year against +21.21% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +2.36% and +12.95% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 15.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -47.7% for GK and -24.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GK charges 0.77% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $77 vs $3 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GK currently yields 0.07% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
79.4% of GK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 36.4% of IVV's money is in holdings GK also owns.
Most of GK is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
20 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in GK and 490 in IVV, against full books of 31 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 462 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GK (62.3% of the fund), and 8 for GK that do not appear in IVV (19.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GK | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.83% | 8.07% | 0.24% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.03% | 7.02% | 1.99% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.22% | 5.69% | 0.47% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 9.05% | 1.63% | 7.42% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 8.25% | 2.39% | 5.86% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 7.50% | 1.38% | 6.12% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 5.02% | 2.65% | 2.37% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.83% | 3.84% | 0.01% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 4.70% | 0.51% | 4.19% |
| TTTt Trane Technologies Plc | 4.27% | 0.15% | 4.12% |
79.4% of GK is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GK or IVV?
GK has an expense ratio of 0.77% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $74 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GK or IVV?
Over the past year GK returned +8.81% vs +16.48% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GK or IVV?
GK has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 15.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GK -47.7% vs IVV -24.5%.
Should I hold both GK and IVV?
GK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GK and IVV?
79.4% of GK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 36.4% of IVV's is in holdings GK also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in GK and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GK or IVV?
GK yields 0.07% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GK?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.