GMOV vs VTI
GMO US Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GMOV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GMOV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $110M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.88% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 166 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +19.11% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.94% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | GMO | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 28, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
GMOV vs VTI Performance
GMO US Value ETF (GMOV) is a ETF from GMO and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GMOV returned +27.94% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GMOV is up 19.11% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.5% for GMOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.0% for GMOV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GMOV charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GMOV currently yields 1.88% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GMOV and VTI share 149 holdings out of 2804 unique holdings combined, representing a 20.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GMOV or VTI?
GMOV has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GMOV or VTI?
Over the past year GMOV returned +27.94% vs +22.35% for VTI, so GMOV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GMOV annualized +18.30% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GMOV or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.5% for GMOV. Worst drawdown: GMOV -17.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GMOV and VTI?
GMOV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GMOV and VTI?
GMOV and VTI share 149 common holdings with a 20.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2804 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GMOV or VTI?
GMOV yields 1.88% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GMOV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.