GUSE vs QQQ

GUSE vs QQQ

Which is better, GUSE or QQQ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. GUSE is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): QQQLess Concentrated: GUSE

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGUSEQQQ
Expense Ratio0.30%0.18%Best
AUM$359M$483.5B
Dividend Yield0.64%0.44%
Holdings122107
YTD Return+11.60%+15.94%Best
1Y Return-+20.44%
3Y Return (annualized)-+24.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+14.26%
Top 10 Weight38.9%Best46.5%
Fund FamilyGoldman Sachs Asset ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 31, 2008Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

GUSE vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

GUSE vs QQQ Performance

Goldman Sachs Enhanced US Equity ETF (GUSE) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, GUSE is up 11.60% versus a gain of 15.94% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GUSE charges 0.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $18 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUSE currently yields 0.64% against 0.44% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

GUSE already in QQQ52.2%
QQQ already in GUSE68.8%

52.2% of GUSE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 68.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings GUSE also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

35 positions in common, counted across the 121 positions we hold weights for in GUSE and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 122 and 107.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 61 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GUSE (28.7% of the fund), and 81 for GUSE that do not appear in QQQ (44.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GUSEWeight in QQQDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.48%8.44%0.04%
AAPLApple, Inc7.32%7.27%0.05%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp4.98%5.76%0.78%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.38%4.67%0.29%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.47%3.36%0.11%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.76%4.43%2.67%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.58%3.16%0.58%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.21%3.13%0.92%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc1.31%3.45%2.14%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.97%2.78%0.81%

68.8% of QQQ is already inside GUSE.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GUSEQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GUSE or QQQ?

GUSE has an expense ratio of 0.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between GUSE and QQQ?

68.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings GUSE also owns. 68.8% of QQQ's is in holdings GUSE also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 121 positions we hold weights for in GUSE and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, GUSE or QQQ?

GUSE yields 0.64% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GUSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than GUSE?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. GUSE is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.