GVLU vs IVV
Gotham 1000 Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GVLU or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. GVLU is less concentrated, with 4.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GVLU | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $256M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.48% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 475 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.49%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.23% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.8% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $15,920 | $19,795Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 4.8%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Gotham ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 7, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 8, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.3 years).
GVLU vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
GVLU vs IVV Performance
Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) is an ETF from Gotham ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GVLU returned +16.48% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, GVLU is up 12.49% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, GVLU compounded at +15.23% per year against +21.38% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +17.21% annualized vs +11.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GVLU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.8% for GVLU and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GVLU charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GVLU currently yields 5.48% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
36.5% of GVLU's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.9% of IVV's money is in holdings GVLU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
179 positions in common, counted across the 480 positions we hold weights for in GVLU and 490 in IVV, against full books of 475 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 305 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GVLU (81.8% of the fund), and 225 for GVLU that do not appear in IVV (53.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GVLU | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.28% | 1.01% | 0.73% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.36% | 0.35% | 0.01% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 0.49% | 0.20% | 0.29% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.45% | 0.24% | 0.21% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.12% | 0.53% | 0.41% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.38% | 0.21% | 0.17% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 0.08% | 0.51% | 0.43% |
| GMGeneral Motors Co | 0.46% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
| PGRProgressive Corporation | 0.38% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.08% | 0.49% | 0.41% |
36.5% of GVLU is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GVLU or IVV?
GVLU has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GVLU or IVV?
Over the past year GVLU returned +16.48% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GVLU annualized +11.42% vs +17.21% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GVLU or IVV?
GVLU has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GVLU -20.8% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both GVLU and IVV?
GVLU and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GVLU and IVV?
36.5% of GVLU's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.9% of IVV's is in holdings GVLU also owns. They hold 179 positions in common, counted across the 480 positions we hold weights for in GVLU and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GVLU or IVV?
GVLU yields 5.48% while IVV yields 1.06%, so GVLU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GVLU?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. GVLU is less concentrated, with 4.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.