GVLU vs VYM
Gotham 1000 Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GVLU or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GVLU led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. GVLU is less concentrated, with 4.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GVLU | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $259M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.71% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 475 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +17.26%Best | +14.82% |
| 1Y Return | +21.62%Best | +20.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.41% | +18.64%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.8% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $16,480 | $16,708Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 4.8%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | Gotham ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 7, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 8, 2022 to Sep 4, 2026 (4.2 years).
GVLU vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
GVLU vs VYM Performance
Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) is an ETF from Gotham ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GVLU returned +21.62% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, GVLU is up 17.26% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, GVLU compounded at +16.41% per year against +18.64% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +13.00% annualized vs +12.63%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GVLU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 13.3% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.8% for GVLU and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GVLU charges 0.50% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $4 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GVLU currently yields 5.71% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
45.7% of GVLU's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 31.6% of VYM's money is in holdings GVLU also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, GVLU as of Aug 18, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
200 positions in common, counted across the 493 positions we hold weights for in GVLU and 602 in VYM, against full books of 475 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 375 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GVLU (66.1% of the fund), and 208 for GVLU that do not appear in VYM (42.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GVLU | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp | 0.29% | 2.36% | 2.07% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group | 0.10% | 1.56% | 1.46% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.00% | 1.46% | 1.46% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.02% | 1.42% | 1.40% |
| MRKMerck & Co. Inc. | 0.01% | 1.32% | 1.31% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.04% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.23% | 0.77% | 0.54% |
| PFEPfizer, Inc. | 0.35% | 0.57% | 0.22% |
| PGRProgressive Corp. | 0.37% | 0.53% | 0.16% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.09% |
45.7% of GVLU is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GVLU or VYM?
GVLU has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GVLU or VYM?
Over the past year GVLU returned +21.62% vs +20.84% for VYM, so GVLU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GVLU annualized +12.63% vs +13.00% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GVLU or VYM?
GVLU has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 13.3% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GVLU -20.8% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both GVLU and VYM?
GVLU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GVLU and VYM?
45.7% of GVLU's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 31.6% of VYM's is in holdings GVLU also owns. They hold 200 positions in common, counted across the 493 positions we hold weights for in GVLU and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GVLU or VYM?
GVLU yields 5.71% while VYM yields 2.24%, so GVLU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GVLU?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GVLU led over 1Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. GVLU is less concentrated, with 4.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.