GVLU vs VTI
Gotham 1000 Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GVLU or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GVLU led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. GVLU is less concentrated, with 4.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GVLU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $256M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.48% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 475 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +12.49%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.23% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.1% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.8% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $15,920 | $19,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 4.8%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Gotham ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 7, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 8, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.3 years).
GVLU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.3 years both funds cover.
GVLU vs VTI Performance
Gotham 1000 Value ETF (GVLU) is an ETF from Gotham ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GVLU returned +16.48% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, GVLU is up 12.49% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, GVLU compounded at +15.23% per year against +21.01% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +16.64% annualized vs +11.42%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GVLU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.8% for GVLU and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GVLU charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GVLU currently yields 5.48% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
88.5% of GVLU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 17.7% of VTI's money is in holdings GVLU also owns.
Most of GVLU is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
434 positions in common, counted across the 480 positions we hold weights for in GVLU and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 475 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 779 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for GVLU (80.0% of the fund), and 9 for GVLU that do not appear in VTI (2.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GVLU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 0.28% | 0.89% | 0.61% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.45% | 0.20% | 0.25% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.12% | 0.52% | 0.40% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 0.49% | 0.14% | 0.35% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.36% | 0.25% | 0.11% |
| GMGeneral Motors Co | 0.46% | 0.11% | 0.35% |
| ACNAccenture Plc | 0.42% | 0.14% | 0.28% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.38% | 0.18% | 0.20% |
| PGRProgressive Corporation | 0.38% | 0.17% | 0.21% |
| ALLAllstate Corp. | 0.45% | 0.09% | 0.36% |
88.5% of GVLU is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GVLU or VTI?
GVLU has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GVLU or VTI?
Over the past year GVLU returned +16.48% vs +16.08% for VTI, so GVLU leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), GVLU annualized +11.42% vs +16.64% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GVLU or VTI?
GVLU has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GVLU -20.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both GVLU and VTI?
GVLU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GVLU and VTI?
88.5% of GVLU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 17.7% of VTI's is in holdings GVLU also owns. They hold 434 positions in common, counted across the 480 positions we hold weights for in GVLU and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GVLU or VTI?
GVLU yields 5.48% while VTI yields 1.03%, so GVLU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GVLU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GVLU led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. GVLU is less concentrated, with 4.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.