HAIL vs QQQ
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAIL | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $20M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 88 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +9.26% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.05% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.05% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.65% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
HAIL vs QQQ Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HAIL returned +18.05% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, HAIL is up 9.26% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, HAIL compounded at +8.05% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -5.65% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HAIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.6% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.3% for HAIL and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAIL charges 0.45% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $18 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAIL currently yields 1.74% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
HAIL and QQQ share 6 holdings out of 184 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAIL or QQQ?
HAIL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HAIL or QQQ?
Over the past year HAIL returned +18.05% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), HAIL annualized +3.79% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HAIL or QQQ?
HAIL has been the more volatile fund at 32.6% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: HAIL -66.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both HAIL and QQQ?
HAIL and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HAIL and QQQ?
HAIL and QQQ share 6 common holdings with a 5.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 184 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAIL or QQQ?
HAIL yields 1.74% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so HAIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.