HAIL vs VYM
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, HAIL or VYM?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HAIL is less concentrated, with 18.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAIL | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 88 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +5.50% | +14.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.05% | +20.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.74% | +18.64%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.89% | +12.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.5% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -66.3% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $6,998 | $17,845Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.0%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 27, 2017 to Sep 4, 2026 (8.7 years).
HAIL vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.7 years both funds cover.
HAIL vs VYM Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HAIL returned +12.05% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, HAIL is up 5.50% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, HAIL compounded at +5.74% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -6.89% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.77% annualized vs +3.35%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HAIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.5% compared with 15.1% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.3% for HAIL and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAIL charges 0.45% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $4 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAIL currently yields 1.74% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
12.8% of HAIL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.2% of VYM's money is in holdings HAIL also owns.
HAIL and VYM share little of their money.
12 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in HAIL and 603 in VYM, against full books of 88 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 558 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for HAIL (95.2% of the fund), and 59 for HAIL that do not appear in VYM (68.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HAIL | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.22% | 0.81% | 0.41% |
| CMICummins Inc. | 1.45% | 0.41% | 1.04% |
| PCARPaccar Inc. | 1.11% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
| BWABorgWarner Inc | 1.27% | 0.06% | 1.21% |
| OSKOshkosh Corp. | 1.15% | 0.04% | 1.11% |
| FFord Motor Co | 0.93% | 0.23% | 0.70% |
| DANDana Inc | 1.12% | 0.01% | 1.11% |
| HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries Inc. | 1.04% | 0.05% | 0.99% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 0.78% | 0.29% | 0.49% |
| IRDMIridium Communications Inc | 1.01% | 0.02% | 0.99% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HAIL and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAIL or VYM?
HAIL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HAIL or VYM?
Over the past year HAIL returned +12.05% vs +20.84% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), HAIL annualized +3.35% vs +9.77% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HAIL or VYM?
HAIL has been the more volatile fund at 32.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VYM. Worst drawdown: HAIL -66.3% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both HAIL and VYM?
HAIL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HAIL and VYM?
12.8% of HAIL's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.2% of VYM's is in holdings HAIL also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in HAIL and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAIL or VYM?
HAIL yields 1.74% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than HAIL?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HAIL is less concentrated, with 18.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.