HAIL vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAIL | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $19M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 87 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +11.85% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +18.03% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.62% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.70% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.7% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -66.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
HAIL vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HAIL returned +18.03% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, HAIL is up 11.85% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, HAIL compounded at +6.62% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -5.70% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +4.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HAIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.7% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.3% for HAIL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAIL charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAIL currently yields 1.59% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
HAIL and VOO share 15 holdings out of 577 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAIL or VOO?
HAIL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HAIL or VOO?
Over the past year HAIL returned +18.03% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), HAIL annualized +4.08% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HAIL or VOO?
HAIL has been the more volatile fund at 32.7% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: HAIL -66.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both HAIL and VOO?
HAIL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HAIL and VOO?
HAIL and VOO share 15 common holdings with a 4.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 577 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAIL or VOO?
HAIL yields 1.59% while VOO yields 1.09%, so HAIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.