HAIL vs IVV
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, HAIL or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HAIL is less concentrated, with 18.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAIL | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $19M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 88 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +1.79% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +6.96% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.57% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.08% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.5% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -66.3% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $6,927 | $18,262Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.0%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2017 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 27, 2017 to Sep 10, 2026 (8.7 years).
HAIL vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.7 years both funds cover.
HAIL vs IVV Performance
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Smart Mobility ETF (HAIL) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HAIL returned +6.96% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, HAIL is up 1.79% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, HAIL compounded at +5.57% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -7.08% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.68% annualized vs +2.92%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HAIL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.5% compared with 16.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -66.3% for HAIL and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAIL charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAIL currently yields 1.74% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
17.1% of HAIL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 13.0% of IVV's money is in holdings HAIL also owns.
HAIL and IVV share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in HAIL and 505 in IVV, against full books of 88 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 480 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for HAIL (86.3% of the fund), and 56 for HAIL that do not appear in IVV (64.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HAIL | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 1.52% | 7.98% | 6.46% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 0.99% | 2.56% | 1.57% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.24% | 1.36% | 0.12% |
| GMGeneral Motors Co. | 1.60% | 0.12% | 1.48% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 1.51% | 0.21% | 1.30% |
| CMICummins Inc. | 1.45% | 0.13% | 1.32% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.22% | 0.25% | 0.97% |
| PCARPaccar Inc. | 1.11% | 0.11% | 1.00% |
| TRMBTrimble Inc. | 1.10% | 0.02% | 1.08% |
| ONOn Semiconductor Corp | 1.05% | 0.05% | 1.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HAIL and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAIL or IVV?
HAIL has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HAIL or IVV?
Over the past year HAIL returned +6.96% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), HAIL annualized +2.92% vs +13.68% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HAIL or IVV?
HAIL has been the more volatile fund at 32.5% annualized versus 16.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HAIL -66.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both HAIL and IVV?
HAIL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HAIL and IVV?
17.1% of HAIL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 13.0% of IVV's is in holdings HAIL also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in HAIL and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAIL or IVV?
HAIL yields 1.74% while IVV yields 1.06%, so HAIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than HAIL?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. HAIL is less concentrated, with 18.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.